1. For my first story about the torture chambers in Syria there was a lot of cross referencing occurring between other media vehicles. Whether it was a newspaper, blog, or social media, there were always links to other websites giving us more information. This was good because I felt that whoever was really interested in the subject could look further into it, rather than just reading that one article. In my second cycle there was not much conjunction with other media channels, I think that is because this was mostly a local news story. I noticed that if something is a national news story, who find a lot more information on the topic, and can cross-reference between different channels. I think this makes an impact on whoever is locally near where the story is occurring, in this case Ohio. For my last story, there was again no linking to other media. This story was not as big as other stories, and did have much cross-referencing.
2. For the news story in Syria, all of the media vehicles had the same information. I think the most effective channel was the TV broadcast and the news article. With the TV broadcast you get to see and hear the interviews between the prisoners, so you get a better insight into what is happening. With the newspaper article, you get a lot of information, more than any of the other vehicles. The least effective was the blog, because it just gave you the main points and did not give much details. All of the media vehicles did site the Humans Rights Watch organization which gave them a lot of credibility. For the story on the missing mother in Ohio the media vehicles were very good on updating their information. Some were faster than others (the newspaper and blog was the best, the broadcast was the least). It did not necessarily convey differently, it was more of which one put out the information faster. Their
stories were supported by the local police and interviews with family. In my third cycle the best media vehicle was the blog, because it is a science magazine, so I found it to be most reliable as well as had the best information. The TV broadcast was not very effective on giving out the information, it was very short and brief.
3. In the first story the one multi-media vehicle I used was CNN for my TV broadcast section. They convey they message to inform everyone on what is secretly happening in the Syrian jails. I'm not sure how this story was presented on actual TV but it seemed like it would be the same. In my second story I did not use any multi-media channels. In my third cycle I used NBC and BBC which are both cable news stations and used their online sites. BBC's news article probably goes into a lot more detail rather than the actual TV broadcast that would be live. They do not give all of the information as there is on the website. NBC has a very short online broadcast that is only a minute long, and it definitely does not go deep into the subject as many of the other media vehicles that I used in this story.
4. With citizen journalism you get a broader perspective on what other think about a particular subject. I think it impacts the audience because it makes them think more about it and see who shares their opinion or who thinks the opposite. In other cases, where you see live footage that somebody took, who feel like you yourself are really in the moment; like when you see videos that people took of the 9/11 attacks or Hurricane Katrina. These things give you more of an impact rather than seeing professional footage. This could raise issues of ethics because sometimes people take things to far, but at the same time people have the right to do and say what they want; even though it happens that certain people can get hurt in the process.







